The following comes from the source of all evil - TMZ:

"A 23-year-old former model claims she interviewed with Seagal last February for the position of executive assistant. Kayden Nguyen says she got the job, but when she showed up for work, she learned, 'Mr. Seagal had been keeping two young female Russian 'Attendants' on staff who were available for his sexual needs 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.' Nguyen alleges in her suit, one of the 'Attendants' had recently quit and it was this job - not executive assistant - Seagal intended her to fill. Nguyen claims the very first night on the job, Seagal treated her 'as 'his sex toy.' Nguyen says in the lawsuit Seagal, pushed his hands under her skirt, tried fondling her breasts and forced his hand down her pants. Nguyen says she complained the next morning - unclear to whom - but nothing was done. Nguyen says the next day Seagal did it again, sexually assaulting her and forcing her to consume illegal pills. And she says there were other sexual assaults that followed. According to the suit, Seagal said, 'My wife wouldn't mind if you and I had a sexual relationship.'

In case you, like myself, are wondering "Eh, why didn't she just leg it?" - according to The Sun, she did manage to escape after the second uninvited fiddling:

"She said she complained the next day to the star's staff, assuming they would pass on the message to him. But hours later, he allegedly tried to make her take 'illegal pills'. Nguyen said when she confronted Seagal, he claimed there had been a 'misunderstanding' - then sexually assaulted her again (it's wrong that I laughed at this point, isn't it). She fled, leaving 'everything of value she owned' including her car keys (and, most notably, her dignity). Nguyen said she was told her belongings would not be returned unless she signed an agreement promising not to report the alleged assaults. She said the actor had a 'unique physiological reaction' to sexual arousal which would support her claims - and that the other girls could corroborate this."

I shudder to think what the "unique reaction" was. Probably a howling, middle-aged man hissy fit, lamenting the miniscule quivering acorn in his pants. This might further explain claims that Segal's missus wouldn't generate two hoots if he took his attempts at rutting elsewhere. Yes, a cheap shot on my behalf but it's all I've got.

The Sun concludes with: "She wants more than $1million - £650,000 - in damages. Seagal's lawyer Marty Singer said the action was 'a ridiculous claim by a disgruntled ex-employee who was fired'."