If all the projected pregnancies Jennifer Aniston has endured were true, she'd have more kids than Angelina Jolie right now. Just saying.

The originator of the rumour this time appears to be Us Weekly Magazine, who are currently circulating the pregnancy story, while with the equally popular "Jen and Justin have split" story is doing the rounds elsewhere.

Apparently the cover story for the current issue of the magazine claims: "After years of trying, she’s finally going to be a mom at 44... How she’s prepping for baby - and a wedding!"

Perez Hilton has joined them, by claiming Jennifer has been busy researching fertility treatments. A source speaking with the gossip site said: "She knows the clock is ticking - she’s well aware of it. She’s also done her homework. She’s explored all methods for having a baby and knows what her options are with IVF. She’s educated herself.”

Adding fuel to the proverbial is Aniston's rep, who has gone out of their way to refute the pregnancy claims, saying: "The entire story is a fabrication. Jennifer is not pregnant!"

This may come as a shock, but reps have been known to say the exact opposite of what is true. I know I keep coming back to Liz Roseberg, but Madonna's ex-mouthpiece is a fine example. In the past she vigorously denied both Madonna's adoption of David Banda, and her subsequent divorce from Guy Richie. Not that we're ones to spread idle gossip, or anything.