At first, it was real and then it was 'for a role'.
However, after reappearing after Ben Affleck was recently spotted on a beach, fans were again left wondering whether his huge back tattoo of a phoenix was in fact real, or whether he'd had it re-done for another film role.
Now, the actor has finally addressed the matter of the large inking on Twitter, after a profile of him in the New Yorkerapparently rankled.
The piece, titled 'The Great Sadness of Ben Affleck', referred to him as an 'exhausted father', called the tattoo 'garish' and said: "Ben Affleck’s is the kind of middle-aged-white-male sadness that the Internet loves to mock - a mocking that depends on a rejection of this sadness, as well as a hedging identification with it."
His response, to be fair, was both pretty good AND seemed to confirm that the tattoo is, in fact real.
See below:
Ben Affleck’s is the kind of middle-aged-white-male sadness that the Internet loves to mock—a mocking that depends on a rejection of this sadness, as well as a hedging identification with it. https://t.co/AHZrRgNrGs
— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) March 26, 2018
Last Saturday, almost exactly two years after Ben Affleck denied its existence, the back tattoo returned to haunt the headlines, itself a phoenix rising from the ashes of gossip rags past. https://t.co/wItYWWlb5I
— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) March 29, 2018
@NewYorker I’m doing just fine. Thick skin bolstered by garish tattoos.
— Ben Affleck (@BenAffleck) March 29, 2018
People liked his response, as you'll see below:
Definitely the punchline of the @NewYorker. pic.twitter.com/Bj5k5FiRSi
— MUGA 2018 (@DemonsToxin) March 29, 2018
he came
😂😂😂 pic.twitter.com/AGVeyaFJul— Sunny (@saiprasad_511) March 29, 2018
Hey @NewYorkerpic.twitter.com/TPzz6EFDKF
— Anthony (@_BrooklynBatman) March 29, 2018
— ςнÑÂ?ιÑ• ÑÂ?ανєи (@ChrisRa7en) March 29, 2018