Lord, there's a whole lot of mammary action going on today. I'm beginning to feel like The Sun's showbiz editor/professional ring fiddler - Gordon Smart. People are aghast at the shots (which we sadly can't publish here, for various reasons) of Sienna Miller hanging around half-nude with "married" Balthazar Getty. However, having done my fair share of snouting about (a technical term for reading other showbiz sites), it would seem it could all just be... a publicity stunt of Madonna proportions.
You have to ask yourself why two famous people would strip nude, on a less-than-private balcony in Italy, if they had something to hide. They want you to think you're seeing something illicit (their clandestine love, that is, not Sienna's boobs, we've seen them a million times before) in order to generate media interest. Why? Oh, the usual; Sienna has four films in the works (one entitled A Woman Of No Importance), while Balthazar probably has a bee in his pants about moving beyond Brothers and Sisters.
Various sources are claiming that Getty has been estranged from his wife for some time: "Sienna didn't break up his marriage. It's been in trouble for a year. The truth is, they've quietly separated." However, other sources are saying Getty's wife, Rosetta Millington, has "decamped" to Italy "with their kids, the youngest just 9 months old." So, he managed to impregnate his wife during their quiet separation? Could Rosetta, like Cynthia Roderiguez, also be in on the game? Is the whole world nothing but a stage to these people?!