Loving the fella in the background. You'll understand the smirk shortly... OK, while Rihanna was technically covered, even her hands are covered, it's just a bit on the sheer side. And, has to be said, she looks pretty damn stunning from the front...

If a little ungainly from the back...

While she did look fabulous, it's not the most convenient look on account of the transparency. Let's have a gander at some dresses that you could fling on without being groomed within and inch of your existence. Let's take Solange Knowles for example. This classy Calvin Klein number a million miles away from the warped cow udder she adorned herself in for her now infamous appearance at the Met Gala last month.

Also breaking out the bling was Blake Lively, in this very pretty scalloped Michael Kors mini.

We don't give Rachel Zoe much of a nod usually, on account of her Zoe-Bot era, but she does look impressive in one of her own designs.

Finally, to Jennifer Hudson. We're not sure what we like about it, probably the originality of the neckline. Should it be a bit more form fitting? Possibly, but she gets away with it.


 
Now to the more questionable contributions. Hellew Lupita Nyong'o. After repeatedly getting it spot on with simple block colours during award season, it's as if she's totally lost her sh*t. It's OK to have a bit of a futuristic flapper melt down at the Met Gala, but this was her chance to pull something sublime out of the bag. While we do appreciate the cut of the top, the shorts look far too shtiff, and don't get us started on hectic print.

My Girl/Veep's Anna Chlumsky is just that little too 'mismatched'

And one of these days I would LOVE to see the Olsens looking their years as opposed to resembling Sarninian oul wans on their way to mass of a Sunday. (we think it's) Mary-Kate's footwear does make up for it, however.