At first, it was real and then it was 'for a role'.
However, after reappearing after Ben Affleck was recently spotted on a beach, fans were again left wondering whether his huge back tattoo of a phoenix was in fact real, or whether he'd had it re-done for another film role.
Now, the actor has finally addressed the matter of the large inking on Twitter, after a profile of him in the New Yorker apparently rankled.
The piece, titled 'The Great Sadness of Ben Affleck', referred to him as an 'exhausted father', called the tattoo 'garish' and said: "Ben Affleck’s is the kind of middle-aged-white-male sadness that the Internet loves to mock - a mocking that depends on a rejection of this sadness, as well as a hedging identification with it."
His response, to be fair, was both pretty good AND seemed to confirm that the tattoo is, in fact real.
See below:
Ben Affleck’s is the kind of middle-aged-white-male sadness that the Internet loves to mock—a mocking that depends on a rejection of this sadness, as well as a hedging identification with it. https://t.co/AHZrRgNrGs
— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) March 26, 2018
Last Saturday, almost exactly two years after Ben Affleck denied its existence, the back tattoo returned to haunt the headlines, itself a phoenix rising from the ashes of gossip rags past. https://t.co/wItYWWlb5I
— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) March 29, 2018
@NewYorker I’m doing just fine. Thick skin bolstered by garish tattoos.
— Ben Affleck (@BenAffleck) March 29, 2018
People liked his response, as you'll see below:
Definitely the punchline of the @NewYorker. pic.twitter.com/Bj5k5FiRSi
— MUGA 2018 (@DemonsToxin) March 29, 2018
he came
😂😂😂 pic.twitter.com/AGVeyaFJul— Sunny (@saiprasad_511) March 29, 2018
Hey @NewYorker pic.twitter.com/TPzz6EFDKF
— Anthony (@_BrooklynBatman) March 29, 2018
— ςнÑÂ?ιÑ• ÑÂ?ανєи (@ChrisRa7en) March 29, 2018