Wanderlust
Director: David Wain
Starring: Jennifer Aniston, Malin Akerman, Paul Rudd
Details: US /98 Mins (16)
Rudd and Aniston are a married couple living a stressful existence in a small, but expensive Manhattan apartment. When they hit some financial difficulty, the couple decide to move to Atlanta to live with Rudd's abusive brother (co-writer Ken Marino) - who is thoroughly enjoying the fact his sibling needs his help. Unable to take his weird behavioural swings, they somehow end up living on a commune, where concoctions of odd characters reside. They then too become odd. For a while.
Listen, there are some laughs to be had at Wanderlust. The problem is that most of those laughs seem to be in spite of the stupid plot. You don't need that high a concept around Paul Rudd. Give him a character, a remotely real feeling one, and let him run with it - you will get laughs. The scenes that do work are almost by accident. Almost every exchange feels improvised; but improvisation only really works in scenarios that can be plucked from some form of reality and there's precious little of that here.
It seems that even the filmmakers forgot to tack on a plot, and one doesn't really turn up until an hour or so in. That doesn't so much give the film purpose, but more signpost the ending so you have an idea of how the whole charade will conclude.
On the plus side the performances are nothing if not committed. Theroux is obviously enjoying himself, and others embrace the silliness with admirable gusto. Aniston and Rudd are also a believable couple, and it's a shame the film didn't given them enough to get their teeth into.
Rudd has his moments, but never moves out of second gear, while the whole thing is centred on too disjointed a concept to connect.
Review by Mike Sheridan
Your Comments
FilmBuff76
If you enjoyed the amusing Role Models a few years ago, then you'll most likely get a kick out of David Wain's new film Wanderlust. Uptight Manhattanites Paul Rudd and Jennifer Aniston lose their tiny but expensive apartment and wander into a hippie commune that still practices free love circa 1971. Much hilarity ensues as they get to grips with doorless rooms, vegetarian meals and a nudist writer. There's also a sub-plot involving land developers who want to build a casino in the area. Rudd continues to show why he's ideal for playing straight-man parts when everyone else lets everything hang loose (literally, in the case of the nudist writer). The film isn't as sharp in its cultural observations as Role Models, but it's a relaxed, easygoing comedy that doesn't overstay its welcome.
Posted 03/03/2012 11:19:49
ifollowillingly
I really think FilmBuff76 deserves a job with this site! I've read a few of his/hers reviews and found they informed me much more about the film and made me feel optimistic about my choice.. However Mike Sheridan's reviews always put me off.. He rarely has anything good to say and writes with just his personal opinion in mind instead of thinking of all the different types of people and their likes etc. I also find him a bit cynical and jaded. Some fresh blood is definitely needed on this site. Please take note!!! Thank You!
Posted 03/03/2012 15:50:16
hellcat1983
I really enjoyed this movie and have also come to completely ignore the"professional" reviews on this website as I find them way off. Like Project X and Safe House 4 stars? Really?
Posted 09/03/2012 09:32:55
Login or Register to leave a comment
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed here are those of the viewer and do not reflect those of Entertainment.ie. Entertainment.ie accepts no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for their accuracy of content. Please contact us to report abusive content
Search for Cinema Listings
Most Popular Reviews
|
|
Men in Black III |
|
|
The Raid |
|
|
Moonrise Kingdom |
|
|
The Lucky One |
|
|
What To Expect When You're Expecting |





