We Need To Talk About Kevin
Director: Lynne Ramsay
Starring: John C. Reilly, Tilda Swinton
Details: US / 112mins (16).
'It's gotten to a point where the people on television are watching television. And what are they watching? People like me,' 15-year-old Kevin (Miller) tells his mother Eva (Swinton). Kevin has always been a problem child – for Eva that is, for gullible hubby Franklin (Reilly) he's nice as pie – and mum and son have been at loggerheads since Kevin was born. When Kevin commits a terrible crime, Eva is forced to look back on his upbringing and figure out what went wrong and questions her own part in the terrible mess...
The adaptation differs to the book from time to time. The title works better for the book as it is written from wife to a presumably here – replaced by flashbacks and flashforwards– maybe the title suggests what the audience will be talking about after the film. Because Kevin raises a lot of questions: Was he born psychotic? Was it something he inherited through an indifferent society? Or was it Kevin picking up on the fact that his mother never wanted him? The old nature vs. nurture chestnut is up for debate.
Every now and then, Ramsay daringly suggests Eva and Kevin are one and the same: when Eva plunges her head into a sink of cold water her face momentarily morphs into his and the close up of Kevin chewing his nails later mimics the close up of Eva pulling broken egg shells from her lips. At one point, in a last ditch effort at a connection, Eva and Kevin play Crazy Golf and Kevin agrees when Eva remarks that fat people are only fat because they eat too much. Ramsay plays around with the idea that this might be all in Eva's head too: the frightened loner takes the Halloween trick-or-treat rampage as a personal attack.
Ramsay, in her first film since 2002, flits about the place like a hyperactive child. She opens …Kevin halfway through, just as Eva reaches the school where horrified paramedics, police, parents and students have gathered, then cuts to a year later with Eva living on her own, and then back to when Eva first got pregnant. The director doesn't hang about in any scene, creating confusion but also interest – what happened? What did he do? It's hard to know what the reaction to this haphazard style will be if one hasn't read the book but Swinton's jaw drop as she sees something off screen at the school will keep curiosity burning until the reveal.
Ramsay flits between the subtle and the obvious too. Instead of shooting needless scenes where the town discuss 'what that woman's son did' the director has silent shots of the town's eyes following Eva around. But there are times she goes overboard: The evil eyes the young Kevin (played first by Rock Duer and then by Jasper Newell – both excellent) shoots his mother is taken straight from The Omen (sometimes all that's missing is Jerry Goldsmith) and the colour red dominates the film to such a degree that it becomes overpowering. John C. Reilly, cast because of his dopey likeability, is, like his character in the novel, still annoyingly clueless.
Miller delivers in the eerie kid department and Swinton? Just give her the Oscar now.
Review by Gavin Burke
Your Comments
scorpio6
I am dying to see this...the book was scary enough,wonder how the film will do,dont like the idea of John C.Reilly as the dad..at all!!!!!!
Posted 20/10/2011 22:18:13
FilmBuff76
After an absence of several years, Scottish director Lynne Ramsay returns with a film that you will definitely want to talk about. Be careful though... If, like me, you're planning on having children in the near future then it might make you think twice about it. In fact, it might do for parenting what Jaws did for swimming... Anyway, this is one of the year's best films, recounting a mother's struggle with her disturbed son Kevin and an awful crime that he committed. In fragmented segments which gradually merge towards the end, we see how dangerous people really are products of their environment. Tilda Swinton gives another fearless performance that must surely be Oscar-worthy. It might present a slightly warped view of the world, where the mother seems to be as damaged as her son, but it holds you firmly in its grasp right to the end. Don't miss it.
Posted 22/10/2011 12:18:38
Francois Dublin
The book was superb, the movie is a great adaptation. Swinton amazing.
Posted 04/11/2011 01:19:03
nimo78
Where is it on? Live in Dundalk and as per usual the IMC ignores it...
Posted 17/11/2011 16:38:30
DoubleLetter
was expecting something better. kevin as a child just comes across supernatural. i was waiting for Tilda to find a scar saying 666 on him at one point. i think the writers (or the book, havnt read it) made baby/toddler kevin just over evil. they made him hate his mother at too much of an early age for it to come across as exagerated. at one point it comes across as if the toddler is just autistic. as a child it starts to get more interesting, probably because they now have the use of dialogue. the most believable scenes of kevin being a young pyschopath are the ones where he manipulates tilda by going along with a lie as to how he broke his arm to his father (knowing he will have the ball in his court with his mother) etc. then older kevin is just annoying. they make him too teenager-y. smart one liners and a "im so over this" attitude is how every teenager acts at one point - i wish they made him wierd rather than annoying such as have him collect dead wasps or i dunno, be perfectly neat and tidy. there are elements of what im talking about such as making that wierd CD and masterbating infront of tilda, more of that behaviour rather than the "ugh whatever mom" attitude would have been more believable. plus i wanted to see more of the fact that he was a recluse. finally, what made me kinda, dislike the film somewhat, was the ending. after sitting through all the film been shown just how evil Kevin is, we never get to see his evilness in action. i wanted to see girls rnning into bathrooms screaming and blood, instead i got bow and arrows in an empty gymnasium!?? such a disapointment. it should have climaxed drammatically. i wanted to see him kill his dad/sister and carry out his deed, but no, the film opted for a pretentiously arty execution which i normally like but it just failed for me in this instance. i also hated how over edited the film is. it kinda hurt my eyes sometimes. oh and why is young kevin CHINESE!!?? the performances are amazing and tilda is captivating. steals every scene she is in and can convey desperation by moving a little finger. the guy who plays kevin is brilliant also, especially the scene where he describes how he is what people want to watch on TV. the dad is rather just... kinda there. tilda could have been a single mom and the film would have worked just the same... i dunno. all in all a brilliant concept and great potential but just not up my street. thought it focused far more on trying to be artsy and forgot they had a very good story to tell.
Posted 30/11/2011 21:09:20
Login or Register to leave a comment
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed here are those of the viewer and do not reflect those of Entertainment.ie. Entertainment.ie accepts no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for their accuracy of content. Please contact us to report abusive content
Search for Cinema Listings
Most Popular Reviews
|
|
Bel Ami |
|
|
Men in Black III |
|
|
Beauty and the Beast 3D |
|
|
The Lucky One |
|
|
The Pact |




