Your Comments

Bryce

I want to see this

Posted 08/09/2011 22:08:40

 

Joker

He's no Alec Guinness, but then again, The Dude was better than the Duke in True Grit, so maybe...heresy?

Posted 12/09/2011 14:04:28

 

Bryce

Heard John Le Carre on radio today - said he was well pleased with the movie.

Posted 14/09/2011 12:35:11

 

KickedArse

This looks quite cold, but cold can be good.

Posted 14/09/2011 13:56:38

 

FilmBuff76

"The movie event of the year"... Yeah, right. Don't believe the hype on the poster. I was quite looking forward to this spy film, but it turned out to be a disappointment. The film starts well but then quickly slows down to an almost glacial pace, leaving the George Smiley character (Gary Oldman) more of a silent presence while the other characters take over. It's only towards the end that Smiley really comes to the fore. Oldman usually dials his performances up to 11, but here he goes in reverse with a cold, calculating performance. This is definitely not a James Bond film, nor was I expecting it to be. But I was at least expecting it to be a tense, thrilling and memorable film. It's none of those unfortunately. It's a missed opportunity.

Posted 15/09/2011 22:29:42

 

jack brown

DO NOT SEE this movie ! . It's like watching paint dry .Very boring, many people walked out during film. please FIRE gavin burke for writing this review ( It's not april fool day ), I am tired of this clown

Posted 17/09/2011 22:51:43

 

Slick

I trust Gavin Burke, I hugely respect Le Carre, and I cannot wait to be bored stoopid - because I have a love for storytelling, and if this movie fails check out my review, cus I'll give you the honest truth. If nothing else, at this point, we must be truly grateful for such a mesmerising cast and source material. Adult films in cinema's, and no 3D - who'd have thunk!! :)

Posted 18/09/2011 04:17:16

 

Conor

much overrated. Some parts are very good. Some parts aren't. Gary Oldman for an Oscar?......nah....

Posted 18/09/2011 23:33:42

 

Andy Millea

Absolutely fantastic film, its great that films aimed at intelligent adults are still been made by someone, its a great change from the overhyped cgi rubbish and crass "comedies" that makes up 99% of english language movies nowadays. The cast are all fantastic and the plot and pacing excellent, it won't appeal to anyone who can't watch something without edits and explosions every 5 seconds though.

Posted 19/09/2011 18:25:46

 

PEBBLETROY

An engrossing film but definitely would need to watch it again as I got lost with the plot a few times especially the flashbacks scenes, this is not a film you can just set back & enjoy, you need to engage with it. Oldman gives a subtle yet effective turn. This is a film that will bore some to death & captivate others!

Posted 20/09/2011 00:59:04

 

ted29

Theres no point in listening to the ones who say "do not see this movie"....what if you are a huge Alfredson fan, or Le Carre or Oldman or Firth....I could say do not go see the Smurfs and my reasons are obvious. They are not so here. Yes it is slow and bleak, but the cold war was hardly down town New Orleans in festival season. The sets are second to none. The performance of Oldman is a wonderful change from his normal Al Pacino on speed type deliveries. You can almost smell the tension and desperation in the air that director Alfredson cultivates...a slow burner without doubt but then i think MOST people would know this isnt Bourne. Its a very well made movie, just not everybodys cuppa is all.

Posted 21/09/2011 18:02:54

 

Runo79

Intelligence has nothing to do with it...As Gavin Burke indicates, it moves at a "snail's pace". Some will enjoy, others will not...I absolutely hated it...I should have read his review before I paid my ~€10...We've been warned!!

Posted 21/09/2011 23:50:27

 

Andy Millea

Why is a film thats edited really fast necessarily better than one that isnt? 2001 moves at what some of you'se would call a "snails pace" and its one of the best films ever made, any idiot can make a film that flys along doesn't mean its going to be a good though.

Posted 23/09/2011 01:11:41

 

Bjorn264

Film of the year - Its great see a movie which even Gary Oldman called it, a "movie for grown-ups", smart, stylish and well paced, a film from a director who respects his audience enough not to spoon feed them information, and rather make the audience pay attention.

Posted 24/09/2011 17:44:16

 

Bullet1001

I too was disappointed by this film. The acting was good, but I found it confusing and extremely slowly paced. I managed to stick it out to the end, although I had long stopped caring who the mole was! Even though I'm a big fan of spy films, I could only recommend this to insomniacs!

Posted 25/09/2011 22:44:35

 

Dave

an absolute bore, I am a cinema goer( 2 ,3 times a week) I may not have the vocab to review movies like the so called experts do but I assure you, I know a good movie when I see one and this.... is NOT a good movie, it had the potential to be a top ten of all time , with such an ensemble of actors but it did not deliver, it was excruciatingly slow and did not deliver in suspense or thrills, all in all in my view its a spy movie with a huge gay slant ( not homophobic) 4 outta 10

Posted 26/09/2011 13:45:24

 

Dublin Boss

How much was Gavin Burke and about a dozen other media companies paid to make this film look and sound good with ridiculous reviews... What a terrible and in agreement with Dave above absolute and utter boring load of rubbish. I rather sit on the pot and read a copy of 'readers digest' than take anything 'Gavin Burke' has to write again. For all audiences, dont bother or waste your time even considering this movie; you are a) wasting your efforts leaving the house b) wasting your valuable euros c) dont even bother getting out on DVD. What an atrochious performance combined with a weak and dreary plot. I am really really annoyed at entertainment.ie for allowing this to be reviewed and 5 starred without having it checked out fully. I really will be heading to a different site to check out my next visit to the cinema. Poor performance Entertainment.ie

Posted 26/09/2011 21:24:37

 

Bjorn264

You can't blame a reviewer on his opinion on a film. Anyone who basis their cinema choices on what a critic thinks, is a fricking moran. I loved it, as I mentioned, but I could see how it might not be for everyone, people who hated it might be inclined to enjoy a Bond Movie or some other watered down 'spy thriller'. 5 stars.

Posted 26/09/2011 23:40:04

 

KickedArse

As is Dylan Moran, Bjorn!?

Posted 27/09/2011 10:49:35

 

jack brown

instead of watching this utterly boring fiasco , go see planet of apes or warrior .

Posted 27/09/2011 11:18:38

 

Pandora

I can't decide if I should watch the original before going to see this.... Alec/Gary, Alec/Gary, tough choice. I am one of the movie goer's who has had their fill of pathetic remakes, 3D monstrosities and acting replaced by CGI. I will gladly pay to watch Gary's paint dry.

Posted 28/09/2011 03:29:31

 

Andy Millea

You won't be disappointed Pandora, seen it for the second time yesterday and it was even better, I too am sick of computer generated muck like Planet of the Apes.

Posted 28/09/2011 12:21:00

 

Bunny Starr

obviously the story had to be truncated considerably due to the difference between cinema time and reading time... the Beeb's version with the late Sir Alec Guinness as Smiley was of the time and took time Gary Oldman's performance is superb... the film aims to depict spies as dullish educated plods who were sexually dysfunctional at best or compromised at worst and were the antitheses of James Bond ... set against the background of the Cambridge Apostles - Burgess, Blunt, Philby and Maclean.. all politics is personal, all people are political, loyalty is priceless and a vurtue in its own right and true frienship succeeds the grave, corruption is the key to maintaining power, love is the absence of fear, fanatics are weak, and in an atmosphere of fear and mistrust you must start by examining yourself then your immediate circle.. the film is well worth the night out, if only to see the masterful attention to seventies detail, and superb acting from almost everyone including "trigger" from folls and horses, nad for those who have seen "let the right one in", the direction will come as no surprise

Posted 28/09/2011 13:26:42

 

Andy Millea

Excellent review Bunny, you really hit the nail on the head.

Posted 28/09/2011 13:59:24

 

peats

I cannot remeber going to a more boring movie.My wife fell asleep and I decided not to wake her. I really wanted to walk out but kept waiting for something to happen-"spy movie of the year" more like bore of the century!!

Posted 30/09/2011 17:34:55

 

flea2001ie

Great film, I totally agree with the reviewer. You'd need another watch to fully get the double crosses. Can't believe people walked out. Maybe there wasn't enough explosions or toilet humour in it for them! Amazing acting in it. Who cast Trigger and Kathy Burke!!!

Posted 04/10/2011 09:47:59

 

Emma

Went to see this film last night and even though i enjoyed the film; cast amazing and beautifully shot, i wouldnt be rushing to tell friends go see it.

Posted 06/10/2011 10:52:48

 

Valhalla

I liked the film and would be a fan of Colin Firth,I thought the atmosphere was excellent, the only down side was Oldman is no Alec Guinness.

Posted 08/10/2011 17:12:38

 

LuckyMe

Excellent old style movie – moody plot, terrific acting keep me engaged throughout and I hadn't read the book

Posted 10/10/2011 10:39:31

 

Nicholas

A great movie and it was great to see an English movie. Very neat and delivered at the end. I reall enjoyed this movie......... Top class acting... Great. I will go to it again *****

Posted 28/10/2011 10:33:41

 

stephen0987654321

Was expecting great things. Love spy stories like Bond, Bourne etc but this film was dire. Really really slow pace and the story wasn't even that interesting to top it all. As enjoyable as a trip to the dentist.

Posted 18/11/2011 21:11:53

 

SeanJO

"After a bungled mission in Hungary that ended in the death of spy Jim Prideaux (Strong), Control (Hurt) employs George Smiley (Oldman), who was forced into early retirement" I don't believe it is Control who employs Smiley.

Posted 01/12/2011 13:46:23

 

Login or Register to leave a comment

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed here are those of the viewer and do not reflect those of Entertainment.ie. Entertainment.ie accepts no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for their accuracy of content. Please contact us to report abusive content

Search for Cinema Listings

Most Popular Reviews

Bel Ami rated 2
Men in Black III rated 2
Beauty and the Beast 3D rated 4
The Lucky One rated 2
The Pact rated 0

Your Reviews...

 rated 4

Character driven spy drama - ging-grr

This movie shows the grittier, less glamorous and dare I say it but most likely truer side of the British Secret... MORE21/11/2011 20:57:37
 rated 2

not impressed - Sarah

This film was geared up to be the spy thriller of the year, and it was a major let down for me. Not only is it slow... MORE09/10/2011 23:45:15
 rated 5

Best film of the year so far. - Andy Millea

Absolutely fantastic film, its great that films aimed at intelligent adults are still been made by someone, its a great... MORE23/09/2011 01:14:07
 rated 3

Good, but the story best suits a tv series format - Eoghan Bolger

Tinker tailor soldier spy. Tinker tailor soldier spy is a spy thriller by Thomas Alfredson, it stars John Hurt, Colin... MORE22/09/2011 00:20:15
 rated 2

lot of promnise but ultimately just not exciting or tense enough - Colm2305

Maybe it was the lack of air con and a packed theatre causing uncomftorable heat in Cineworld Parnell Street, maybe it... MORE21/09/2011 10:35:39

Showing 1-5 of 7 Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy viewer reviews.
Click here for more...

Seen a film that you just can't stop talking about? Write a review and tell us!