Your Comments

FilmBuff76

Susan Hill's bone-chilling 1983 novel The Woman In Black is one of those ghost stories that keeps regenerating, whether it's a stage play, TV movie or this new screen adaptation from the recently resurrected Hammer Films. Daniel Radcliffe tries to break away from Harry Potter as a dour, serious solicitor sent to tidy up the affairs of the late, suitably named Mrs Drablow. In her creepy, isolated house, he discovers an evil presence... and in true Hammer fashion, some fearful, suspicious villagers. An attempt at a resolution with the titular character is a new addition to the story, but it works well. The film is strong on atmosphere, building up a palpable sense of dread throughout... but yet the film never really feels that scary. To a seasoned horror fan like myself, it comes across as rather mild and not as scary as the 1989 TV movie. It's well worth a look though.

Posted 10/02/2012 20:44:50

 

hellcat1983

This movie is absolutely terrifying! I urge all horror movie lovers to go see this.

Posted 15/02/2012 12:11:38

 

FilmBuff76

It's not as terrifying as it could have been. The distributor asked for 6 seconds of cuts in order to tone down the horror. This was in order to secure a 12A in the UK and we seem to have got the same print despite the higher 15A rating here. I can tell it's the cut print because I've heard that the scene where a girl sets herself on fire was significantly cut down to get the lower rating. A shame. Since when are horror films made for children? After all, it's a story about a child-killing ghost. That's not exactly a bedtime story...

Posted 16/02/2012 19:27:08

 

Bjorn264

Awful movie, very unoriginal, (perhaps the TV movie was better) relies on sudden jumps for its scares rather than its plot. Horrible casting for the lead. Just a poor outing all round... avoid.

Posted 21/02/2012 15:06:15

 

Tura

Are you saying he is too young to be a father? Or just looks like it? Surely he doesn't need to be over 20 - what with 13 year olds breeding like rabbits nowadays, he wouldn't need to be older than 17. He has sideburns for god's sake, how much older does he need to look?

Posted 22/02/2012 18:14:34

 

Login or Register to leave a comment

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed here are those of the viewer and do not reflect those of Entertainment.ie. Entertainment.ie accepts no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for their accuracy of content. Please contact us to report abusive content

Search for Cinema Listings

Most Popular Reviews

Men in Black III rated 2
Moonrise Kingdom rated 2.5
The Raid rated 4.5
Cosmopolis rated 0
What To Expect When You're Expecting rated 3

Your Reviews...

 rated 3

Very decent horror - Fiona74

Daniel Radcliffe plays a single father trying to get over the death of his wife, when is sent by work to a creepy old... MORE12/03/2012 12:47:18
 rated 3

Some memorable scares but slightly marred by gratutious SFX - WS

I was curious to see this film. I haven't been to the original play or read the book, though I have read and enjoyed... MORE07/03/2012 19:44:44
 rated 4

A great return for Hammer - ging-grr

I have to say I was really excited when i heard Hammer Horror were back producing films and when I heard they were... MORE23/02/2012 19:35:07
 rated 4

Very scary, very good - mart1n

Il start by saying i really liked the book by Susan Hill and any ghost story is good if it's scary and can fill you... MORE20/02/2012 09:03:23
 rated 4

Best horror film in years - Eoghan Bolger

The woman in black The woman in black is a horror drama, starring Daniel Radcliffe, it sees the Harry Potter actor... MORE13/02/2012 23:22:14
Seen a film that you just can't stop talking about? Write a review and tell us!