Your Comments

Grover

The reviewer hit the nail on the head. What a tediously boring and utterly pointless film. As bland as a plain rice cake. Depp seems to do his best with what sparse material he is given and all that's left for Jolie to do is to walk around, look pretty (so much so that everywhere she goes people stop and stare, just in case the audience didn't quite get the point that her character is beguilingly beautiful) with a perstitent wry smile on her perfectly made-up face. The film tries much too hard to be mysterious, with action sequences containing as much excitment as a costume drama, the occasional humour is oddly placed and the plot itself is ridicously threadbare and obvious. An extremely dissapointing outing from the actors and director. Avoid unless your idea of an evening's entertainment invovles watching paint dry.

Posted 09/12/2010 12:03:16

 

Bitter Irish Fruit

Tourism advert for Venice. Johnny might need a slap round the face for starring in this horror but Jolie really needs a plate of batter burgers. She could slice bread with those shoulder blades :-/

Posted 10/12/2010 15:12:48

 

Lord Sabre

Mike Sherdian is right - what's Depp taking on a role that Sam Worthington turned down. This is just awful. Depp hasn't been decent since he started that Pirates franchise.

Posted 14/12/2010 17:42:42

 

pinkmonkey

A disturbingly bad film in so many ways. I usually don't hate Angelina Jolie like so many others do. However she is now on my list... Firstly, her english accent was so horrificly rediculous - like a countess from the 19th century. Secondly, her acting was as dull as a doorknob. Thirdly, she is so incredibly underweight that it I could barely look at her wasted child's body for 2 hours. She has clearly overdone the spy film genre in 2010, though SALT was far better than this junk. The storyline can only be described as laughable and generally a waste of space. Johnny - why? And that is all.

Posted 16/12/2010 01:11:46

 

fluffy kitten

I find it difficult to take a professional film reviewer seriously when they get the name of FlorianHVD's outstanding Oscar winning movie wrong. Even worse they do not appear to have an understanding of the film making process: praising Worthington for dropping out of *this* version of the film is misleading - he dropped out long before the final rewrite and multiple director changes. The "What the hell was Depp thinking" comment highlights the reviewers lack of awareness - how many times has this been said of Depp before? Surely at this stage no one in the movie industry *expects* a Depp-starrer to be good? It is common knowledge that he has starred in as many bad movies as good ones. The "stupid beard/hair" should be obvious to anyone who has seen the movie and has a remote understanding of character development. Unless of course the reviewer didn't watch this movie? The review appears to be nothing but a rehash of other critics opinions without an original observation... As for the movie: A lot was expected of this movie with that much talent involved. It didn't live up to expectations, but while it was not a good movie it was *intended* to be a light fluffy movie and it succeeded at that. I do not believe it would have received a total slating had it starred 2 lesser-known stars and expectations not been so high, and it not been marketed incorrectly as an exciting action-driven spy thriller. (This "reviewer" even scored Burlesque TWICE what he gave the Tourist. Seriously?!!?!). No it was not a good movie but it did not deserve the total slating it got, which is reflected by its steady ticket sales by the movie-goers themselves despite the critics mauling.

Posted 12/01/2011 16:14:22

 

fluffy kitten

(Apologies for the single block of text in my comment above, the paragraphs were automatically removed)

Posted 12/01/2011 16:15:56

 

KickedArse

People laughed at the Golden Globe press conference when Depp was nominated for The Tourist. It's an embarrassment for everyone involved. In fairness, Kitten, the reviews here are live before anywhere else. So the copying other reviewers comment is harsh. You can check the postings on the FB page for the date it went live FYI. In my opinion, an awful film.

Posted 12/01/2011 20:56:49

 

Login or Register to leave a comment

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed here are those of the viewer and do not reflect those of Entertainment.ie. Entertainment.ie accepts no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for their accuracy of content. Please contact us to report abusive content

Search for Cinema Listings

Most Popular Reviews

Men in Black III rated 2
Moonrise Kingdom rated 2.5
The Raid rated 4.5
Cosmopolis rated 0
Dark Shadows rated 2

Your Reviews...

 rated 1

woeful - paula galvin

This has to one of THE most awful films I have seen in the last decade .It is excrutiatingly,mind-numbingly frightful... MORE23/05/2011 13:14:38

Summary - Honest69

ok we have two of the most beautiful actors here who we have preconceived idealistic ideas about, shes under... MORE29/01/2011 02:21:04
 rated 3

An Okay Film - jennith

This film is not as bad as people make it out to be it is not brilliant either but it is okay you have 2 very good... MORE02/01/2011 12:16:23
 rated 1

Bad bad BAD - pinkmonkey

A disturbingly bad film in so many ways. I usually don't hate Angelina Jolie like so many others do. However she is now... MORE16/12/2010 01:17:58
 rated 1

Bland, uninspiring and lacking any chemistry from its mega-star leads, The Tourist must be the most disappointing movie of the year. - Grover

What a tediously boring and utterly pointless film. As bland as a plain rice cake. Depp seems to do his best with what... MORE14/12/2010 16:09:54
Seen a film that you just can't stop talking about? Write a review and tell us!