Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
It's fair to say that Man of Steel didn't hit all the right notes for audiences when it was first released.
The argument was, and this may be true, was that there was still a hold-over from Nolan's golden era and that Zack Snyder's less-than-subtle approach to the character was coming up short against it. It's now been four years since The Dark Knight Rises, but Nolan's shadow still hangs over all comic-book films - whether people like to admit or not.
Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice picks up during the final stages of Man of Steel and sees a 9/11-style apocalypse happening in Metropolis with Bruce Wayne (Ben Affleck) powerless to stop it. Flash-forward to 18 months later and Superman's now become a huge talking point across the globe. Is he to be trusted? Is he for humanity or against us? Does he intend on making himself into a tyrant to rule the world? Should there even be a Superman? These questions are raised time and time again throughout the film, but they're not fully answered. For the sake of spoilers, we'll leave the plot synopsis there. We will say, though, that the plot is a bit of a mess. In fact, it's all a bit of mess.
There's so many good points to the film, but there are so many frustrating aspects of it that - more often than not - block the good points from getting through. Ben Affleck, thankfully, is a good point. His characterisation of both Bruce Wayne and Batman is pitch-perfect. There really is a sense that this Batman is more damaged and much more violent than anything we've seen before. Where Christian Bale's Batman was unhinged, Ben Affleck's Batman is cruel - and he has reason to be. As physically imposing as he is, there is something truly dark and violent lurking underneath the cowl that, hopefully, will be explored more fully in the eventual standalone film.
Henry Cavill, this time out, is given significantly less dialogue - probably because he's, sadly, not that good an actor. It's more that things happen to Superman rather than him being proactive about them. We see Superman as this shining light of hope, but very often, he's being dragged into the muck of people's baser instincts and he becomes just a pawn in a larger game. Likewise, Amy Adams' Lois Lane doesn't serve much purpose in the story. She's almost, in a sense, in the way all the time. Gal Gadot, however, has latched on to something with Wonder Woman and gives a reasonably restrained performance - possibly because her own film is due out pretty soon and they don't want to give it all away.
We come to Jesse Eisenberg, who's the big bad as Lex Luthor. When first announced, everyone automatically put two and two together and assumed that this Luthor would be, essentially, Mark Zuckerberg in the DC Cinematic Universe. That's accurate. Eisenberg plays Luthor with almost no subtlety and overplays his hand as the egomaniacal genius too often; chewing the scenery whenever he can and openly monologuing during a key scene. It's a real shame because, like it or not, Luthor is a key part of the story and it's lacking here. The supporting cast of Diane Lane, Laurence Fishburne, Scoot McNairy, Holly Hunter and Jeremy Irons all fill out their roles very well, especially in a film where it's very easy to get lost in the fireworks.
David S. Goyer, the screenwriter, and Zack Snyder, the director, are both known for being about as subtle as a fart in a bath-tub. However, with the addition of Oscar-winning screenwriter Chris Terrio, they've been tempered somewhat. That said there are too many sequences in the film that feel like cheating. Instead of using a more nuanced approach to show what the characters are thinking or feeling, the point is repeatedly hammered on top of you and written in block capitals for all to see. Then again, it's a comic-book movie. Subtlety's not really needed, is it?
It all looks pretty and, despite all these points, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is an entertaining enough watch. It has moments that are engaging and thrilling, but you'll come away pining for something less busy and over-long. Worth a watch, but about as good as Man of Steel.
Review by Brian Lloyd | 10:42 | Tuesday 22nd March 2016 | Movie Review
"Nolan's shadow still hangs over all comic-book films" where exactly did it hang over Deadpool ?Posted 20:31 | Wed 23rd Mar 2016
Deadpool was a p**s take , a good one but it didnt take itself seriously , this does , thats why christophers nolan standards need to be met for dc movies , goin to see this tmw nite , not hoping for much but action is supposed to be pretty impressivePosted 18:54 | Thu 24th Mar 2016
I liked it. Affleck is one *seriously* p**sed-off Batman.Posted 12:22 | Wed 30th Mar 2016
Don't get too hopeful on this one. It's not great. The actual standoff which eventually happens wasn't exactly epic. And Jesse E is as annoying as expected. Thought the Pope was going to make a cameo, everything else was there, Jesus coming off the cross, the Easter release timing. Corn and cheese and served up on a plate, Cinemas were instructed to serve communion. The end of the movie just keeps going on and on and on. And on. Disappointing overall. Affleck is a good choice as Batman though.Posted 13:28 | Wed 30th Mar 2016
ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC! I loved this movie.I dont know what movie the reviewer was watching but it certainly wasnt this one.Affleck is easily the best Batman ever and Gal Gadots Wonder Woman is a real scene stealer.Henry Cavill continues to impress as Superman.The film is huge feast for the eyes and ears and the battles are stunning! This isnt an easy to digest popcorn flick like the Marvel movies ( Fun as they are ) but its an epic film which requires you to pay attention ( Thats a good thing! ).This was even better than the terrific Man Of Steel. Roll on Justice League and the rest of the DCEU!Posted 20:27 | Fri 1st Apr 2016
A very enjoyable movie. I have a feeling that the studios are beginning to realise that at some stage they will be flogging a dead horse when it comes to superhero movies, and in order to avoid this happening, they have decided to really try and tell a interesting story and add bits and pieces that work well with other movies.This film is a good example of that. The story would stand well enough on its own, and things like a dream sequence and making Batman a bit of a Jason Bourne all help. Having said that of course, action is the main driver in this movie, but I think the mixing of both elements works well. The film is a bit long, but I would put that down to Christopher Nolan; he really does like to give us value for our money.Posted 16:52 | Mon 4th Apr 2016
good fight in between god and man ... the ending is not the ending ... is just the beginning of a new storyPosted 05:18 | Wed 6th Apr 2016
Agree mostly with this review but I think film is lot worse than that,story is awful overlong & boring,by the time it got to the big fight I realised it was not well directed or written a missed opportunity to be sure pity could've been epic,although Afflecks Bruce wayne/Batman was Awsome in every way hope he directs the Batman solo filmPosted 21:29 | Fri 22nd Apr 2016
Log in to leave a comment
The opinions expressed in the comments section are those of the viewer and do not reflect those of Entertainment.ie. Entertainment.ie accepts no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy of viewer comments. Please contact us to report abusive comments